Goa, India · Remote worldwide
Freelance developer, agency, or in-house?
You have four realistic options for getting software built. Which one fits depends on the shape of your project, not on which option wins in the abstract.
I work as an independent developer, so I have an obvious stake in your answer. I wrote this to stay useful even if you decide I'm the wrong fit, and one section below covers when that happens.
The short version
Pick an agency when the scope needs several people and you want process more than direct access. Pick a marketplace freelancer for a small, well-defined task you could afford to redo. Hire in-house when you need a standing engineering function. Pick an independent developer when you have one focused system that has to hold up in production, and you want to talk to whoever writes it.
Where the money goes
Agency pricing carries account management, sales, project management and bench time. That overhead buys you continuity when someone leaves and a manager to escalate to. On a single-system project it also swallows most of the invoice.
Marketplace pricing looks cheaper, and sometimes it is. Competitive bidding pushes clients toward whoever promises the most for the least, and you absorb the cost when the work needs redoing.
When you should not hire me
Hire an agency when you need five people working in parallel against a fixed launch date. Look elsewhere for 24/7 production support, because one person cannot hold an on-call rotation. Hire in-house for ongoing product engineering with no defined end, which costs less over a year. Go to a design studio when the project is design-led with little engineering underneath.
Where an independent developer wins
Projects that cross hardware and software, where an agency subcontracts one half and hands you the seam. Projects where you want the person you briefed to be the person who writes the code. Projects with a serious budget that falls short of agency scale, where you would rather spend it on engineering than on account management.
The options side by side
A development agency
- Strength:
- Bench depth and account management, with the capacity to absorb a large scope.
- Trade-off:
- You pay for that overhead. The developer writing your code is often someone you never spoke to, and agencies subcontract hardware work anyway.
- Pick me when:
- You have one focused system to build, and you want to talk to whoever writes the code.
A marketplace freelancer
- Strength:
- Cheap and fast to hire.
- Trade-off:
- Clients on those platforms tend to pick whoever promises most for least. Few candidates cover both hardware and full-stack, so integration falls back on you.
- Pick me when:
- The system has to hold up in production, and a rewrite three months in would cost more than building it right the first time.
Hiring in-house
- Strength:
- Full-time attention and long-term ownership of the system.
- Trade-off:
- Months of hiring, plus salary and equipment overhead. Hard to justify when you need one system built once.
- Pick me when:
- You want a finished product handed over at the end.
What you get
One person covers firmware, backend, frontend, and deployment
On a connected-hardware project, most clients hire a firmware contractor and a separate web agency, then carry the integration risk themselves. I built Smart Well Management and Smart Waste Management alone: sensor selection, ESP32 firmware, database, dashboard, deployment.
Eleven shipped projects with live demos and public source code
Most portfolios show mockups. Nine of the eleven projects here link to a working deployment, a public GitHub repository, or both.
Five hackathon podium finishes, including Smart India Hackathon
Judges at five events scored these builds against other teams under a deadline. That carries more weight than my own claim about how fast I work.
India-based rates, timezone that overlaps Europe and the Gulf
IST (UTC+5:30) gives you a full morning overlap with Europe and the Middle East, and an evening overlap with US Eastern. You pay Indian rates without routing the work through an intermediary.
You own the code from day one
Your code sits in your repository and deploys to your infrastructure, with setup documentation at handover. You never rent a platform from me.
Relevant services
IoT & Connected Hardware
Sensor-to-dashboard systems built end to end: the board, the firmware, the cloud sync, and the screen your team watches it on.
Full-Stack Web Applications
Production web apps with working auth, roles, and data behind them, built for your case rather than dropped onto a template.
Questions
Is a freelance developer cheaper than an agency?
Yes, in most cases, because you skip account management, sales overhead and bench time. Cheaper does not always mean better value. An agency covers you when one person drops out, which is worth paying for on a long or business-critical programme.
What's the risk of hiring one person instead of a team?
Bus factor. One person can fall ill or drop out. I keep your code in your repository from day one, write setup documentation, and stick to mainstream tools, so another developer can pick it up without me. On a long programme with a hard deadline that risk may still be too high for you, which is a fair reason to choose an agency.
How do I judge whether a developer can deliver?
Ask for systems you can open and use instead of screenshots. Ask what went wrong on a recent project and how they handled it. Ask who owns the code and where it lives. Treat a vague answer to any of those as your answer.
Tell me what you're trying to build
A couple of sentences is enough. I read each message myself and reply within about a day, including a straight no when the work is a poor fit.
Get in touch